Overview

Overview of our case
Case
Category
Two
case2
In 2023, a certain brand launched a smart LED light featuring remote dimming and voice control via a mobile app. After purchasing the lights, over 200 consumers nationwide discovered that the app frequently experienced connection failures and control delays. Some lights even suddenly went out during app operations. Consumers contacted the brand’s customer service, who only offered ineffective solutions like “restarting the router” and “uninstalling and reinstalling the app,” refusing to acknowledge the product’s defects. Consumers subsequently formed a rights protection group, collecting evidence such as videos of the malfunction and chat logs, and filed a collective complaint with the 12315 platform. An investigation by market regulators revealed that the brand’s smart lights’ Bluetooth module had compatibility issues, preventing them from reliably connecting to devices and representing a design issue. Ultimately, the brand issued a recall announcement, offering refunds and 200 yuan shopping vouchers to all consumers.
Learn More

Smart LED lights frequently fail to function under app control, leading consumers to receive collective refunds.

case1
An outdoor LED bulletin board installed in a residential complex in 2023 went black after just eight months due to continuous rainfall. Professional inspections revealed cracking and aging of the screen’s sealant, allowing rainwater to seep into the internal circuitry, causing a short circuit and completely burning out the core driver board. When the homeowners contacted the installation company, they refused repairs, claiming the six-month warranty had expired and that the rainfall was considered force majeure. They offered only a high-priced replacement (offering a price exceeding 70% of the initial installation fee). The community homeowners’ committee, after compiling evidence, discovered that the LED board was purchased from an unqualified, small manufacturer and installed without undergoing IP65 waterproofing testing. They have now joined over 50 other homeowners in filing a complaint with market regulators, demanding the manufacturer assume responsibility for repairs and compensate for lost work time.
Learn More

LED outdoor screen water intrusion short circuit claim case

case2
In early 2024, a portion of the LED skylight in the atrium of a shopping mall suddenly detached. The falling panel struck Ms. Li, a shopper below, causing a contusion on her arm. An investigation revealed that, due to a tight deadline, the installation contractor failed to use load-bearing brackets as required by the design, relying solely on simple clips for fixation without conducting load tests. Furthermore, after prolonged operation, the skylight’s fixing components experienced metal fatigue due to poor heat dissipation, ultimately causing the detachment. The injured victim’s family is seeking compensation totaling 50,000 yuan from the mall for medical expenses and lost wages. The mall, however, is shifting the blame onto the installation company, leading to a dispute among the three parties. The local housing and construction department has intervened, requiring the mall to conduct a comprehensive investigation of similar facilities for safety hazards.
Learn More

Case of dispute involving injury caused by LED screen falling off in shopping mall

case2
A county launched a “Rural Lighting Project” in 2022, purchasing 200 LED streetlights and promising a “luminous decay of no more than 20% within five years.” However, just 18 months later, nearly 100 of the streetlights had significantly decreased in brightness, with some even failing to illuminate properly. The local village committee contacted the operation and maintenance company for inspection, which discovered that the streetlights’ LEDs had aged rapidly due to a heat dissipation design flaw, resulting from long-term high-temperature operation and a luminous decay rate of 45%. The operation and maintenance company claimed that the “supplied LEDs were substandard,” while the manufacturer argued that the operation and maintenance company failed to regularly clean the heat dissipation components as required, with both parties shifting the blame. The county transportation department has summoned both parties, demanding rectification within a specified timeframe, replacing the defective LEDs, and conducting a comprehensive inspection of the remaining streetlights.
Learn More

LED Street Light Rapid Fade Operation and Maintenance Compensation Case

Products
Contacts
WhatsApp
Email